From 25ff1766966ed76d9c01d6bd679ec614a25d0e0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jay Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 06:39:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] missed a quotation mark --- ...2023-01-15-why-the-dvs-2-port-is-better-for-digital-modes.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pages/_posts/2023-01-15-why-the-dvs-2-port-is-better-for-digital-modes.md b/pages/_posts/2023-01-15-why-the-dvs-2-port-is-better-for-digital-modes.md index 05ae084..ead214c 100644 --- a/pages/_posts/2023-01-15-why-the-dvs-2-port-is-better-for-digital-modes.md +++ b/pages/_posts/2023-01-15-why-the-dvs-2-port-is-better-for-digital-modes.md @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ not exclude them. But, thankfully, my desire to DIY/hack together everything I c One of the things on my list was to see about home-brewing a DVS-2. I didn't feel like spending the money to find one on that auction site, in fact I refuse to do any business with that place to start with. I knew the port had some additional control lines other than just audio and PTT, so I did a little digging around to see what -they might do. That's when I stumbled across VA3CR's page (SSL expired) about the DVS-2 as well as GM0ONX's page about an interface that used the DVS-2 port. Both pages provided information about interfacing with this port, with VA3CR's page providing a truth-table for the control lines. Though I'd originally planned on making a hardware device for voice-keying, this was just single-tracked thought. Both of these pages gave me the solution I really needed: just interface with the DVS-2 port. The muting of the microphone when keying