Hotspot Coordination
							parent
							
								
									74a2e1b03d
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						382bee9234
					
				@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
 | 
				
			|||||||
 | 
					---
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					title: Hotspots In The Bandplan
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					layout: post
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					date: 2023-01-25 05:42:40
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					tags: Blog
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					excerpt_separator: <!--more-->
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					---
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					I'm getting ready to put my MMDVM hotspot back online after a few months. Having not have to set one up from scratch
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					in a couple years, I forgot where I used to keep them. When I consulted my local bandplan, I found a surprise.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					<!--more-->
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Finding a place to use your hotspot used to be a matter of just sticking it somewhere in the simplex and hope it
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					didn't interfere with anyone. A lot of people had a nasty habit of slapping them in wrong sections, like in
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					EME/weak-signal sections; which angered people who did EME. Another valid option was to stick it in Auxiliary/repeater
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					links, provided there wasn't anything actually working there. Technically, the band-plans aren't specified in Part 97
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					and aren't law; but for the most part we all abide by it. When I got my hotspot, I ran it up in the sections my local
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					bandplan said was for auxiliary/repeater links. This was based on research I did years prior on doing an FM Echolink
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					node, which seemed to allude such a device would be an auxiliary station. When I had my full-duplex spot, I ran it
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					on what the local coordinator [TMARC](http://www.tmarc.org) called a "Shared Non-Protected Pair". 
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					That was back in June of 2020, so I hadn't been to their page in quite some time. Not remembering the local band-plan
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					I hopped over to their website to get a bit of a refresher. I was shocked to find out that a month later, in July of
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					2020; they adopted suggested segments for hotspots on 2m and 70cm. In the case of 70cm they carved out two segments:
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					- 438.0125 - 438.2875
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
						- Indoor antenna, power <100mw
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					- 439.800 - 440.000
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
						- Outdoor antenna, power > 100mw
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Both cover hotspots/radio-over-IP nodes with the latter listing cross-band and other things that can't be coordinated.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					While it's probably not that big of a deal in the large scheme of things; it's nice to know they've done something. If
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					you run a hotspot, you might want to check your repeater coordinator to see if they've got a recommended spot to run.
 | 
				
			||||||
					Loading…
					
					
				
		Reference in New Issue